REBECCA BOOK REVIEW

Du Maurier’s bestselling novel reveals a lot around the author’s fluid sexuality – her ‘Venetian tendencies’ – and around being a boy stuck in the wrong body, writes Olithrough Laing


*

In 1937, a young army wife sat at her typewriter in a rented home in Alexandria, Egypt. She wasn’t happy. Despite coming from an ebullient theatrical household, she was reclusive and agonisingly shy. The social needs that came through being married to the commanding officer of the second Battalion Grenadier Guards were far past her. It was also warm and also she missed England bitterly, though not the tiny daughter and new baby she’d left behind.

You watching: Rebecca book review

At the age of 30, she had already publimelted four novels and also 2 biographies. Yet 15,000 words of her new book were torn up in the wastepaper basket, a “literary miscarriage”. She kbrand-new the title however not what would constitute the “crash! bang!” of its plot, simply that there would be 2 wives, one dead, and also the name: Rebecca.

Inchingly, Daphne du Maurier’s difficult novel came together. She wrote it in the initially perchild, from the perspective of a young unnamed narrator, who meets the dashing, yet unhappy Max de Winter while functioning as a lady’s companion in a grand also hotel in Monte Carlo. The girl is anxious, observant, dreamy, terribly romantic, a perennial fantasist whose fears and also insecurities bloom out of regulate when she becomes mistress and anxiety of the haunting Manderley.

Rebecca is a very stselection book. It’s a melodrama, and also by no suggests short on bangs and crashes. There are 2 sunken ships, a murder, a fire, a costume party and multiple complicated betrayals, and also yet it’s startling to realise how a lot of its drama never before actually happens. The second Mrs de Winter might not excel at a lot, but she is among the excellent dreamers of English literary works. Whole pages go by devoted to her imaginings and speculations. The result is curiously unsteady, not so a lot a story as a netoccupational of possibilities, in which the reader is promptly entangled.

“One is not born, however rather becomes, a woman,” Simone de Beauvoir shelp, and tright here aren’t many darker illustrations of what this could intend and also what it can cost than Rebecca. The narrator is raw as an egg, virtually a schoolgirl, through her “lanky” hair and also bitten nails, her inability to talk to servants or run a house. Rebecca, on the various other hand also, is finished: lacquered and exquiwebsite as the priceless china cupid her clumsy replacement breaks. It was Rebecca who created Manderley, turning the lovely old home right into the apotheosis of feminine talents and also virtues.


*

Crime and high camp … the poster for Alfred Hitchcock’s 1940 film adaptation of Du Maurier’s thriller. Photograph: Movie Poster Image Art/Getty ImagesOf course, this paragon of beauty and also kindness transforms out to be a malevolent fake. In the Du Maurier family members slang a sexually attractive person was a “menace”, and also Rebecca unites both the word’s interpretations. She is an animal, a devil, a snake, “vicious, damnable, rotten with and also through”. She’s destroyed because of her poisonous sexuality, what the Daily Mail could euphemistically call her “lifestyle”.

Amazingly, the reader is someexactly how manipulated or cajoled into believing her murder and also its concealment are somejust how crucial, even romantic; that being cuckolded is a far worse fate than a woman’s death. It’s a grim reworking of “Bluebeard, in which the murderer is all of a sudden the victim, adorable despite his bloody hands.

But who is really punimelted, and for what? Rebecca has a disturbingly circular structure, a closed loop like James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake. It ends with Manderley in flames, yet the first 2 chapters are likewise the conclusion. Husband and also wife have been condemned to the hell of expatriation, in a warm, shadowmuch less, uncalled country, continuing to be favor criminals in an anonymous hotel. It is apparent that they are revenants in a kind of immortality, their only pleasure write-ups from old English magazines about fly fishing and cricket. The narrator attests to their hard-won happiness and also freedom, while understanding it stays in a place easily accessible just by the unspecific paths of dream and also memory, expelled from the Eden they never before rather possessed.

Du Maurier was under no illusions as to the bleakness of what she had actually created. “It’s a little bit on the gloomy side,” she told her publisher, Victor Gollancz, including nervously “the ending is a bit brief and a little bit grim”. But her predictions of bad sales were inprecise. Rebecca was a bestseller; 80 years on it still shifts roughly 4,000 copies a month.

What really startled her was that everyone seemed to think she’d composed a romantic novel. She believed Rebecca was about jealousy, and that all the relationships in it – including the marriage in between De Winter and his shy second wife – were dark and unsettling. (“I’m asking you to marry me, you little bit fool” hardly betokened love in between equates to.) The concept had actually emerged out of her own jealousy about the womale to whom her husband, Tommy “Boy” Browning, had briefly been engaged. She had looked at their love letters, and also the significant elegant “R” through which Jan Ricarexecute signed her name had made her painfully aware of her very own shortcomings as a womale and a wife.

As a boy, Du Maurier dressed in shorts and also ties and invested the majority of of her time pretfinishing to be her transform ego, Eric AvonIt wasn’t simply that Du Maurier was shy, or disliked informing servants what to execute. Though she was beautiful, she had never before wanted to get involved in the masquerade of femininity. She didn’t desire to be a mother (at least not of daughters) or wear dresses, though she painted her confront even to go on her beloved rain-lashed walks. What she liked was to be “jam-along”, scruffy, perpetually in trocustomers, messing around in watercrafts or living at huge in her very own head.

See more: Inferno (Robert Langdon, #4) By Dan Brown Inferno Book Review

As Margaret Forster’s revelatory 1993 biography made clear, Du Maurier had actually been favor that given that childhood, constantly dreaming up other possibilities, never specific that civilization, or also time, were as steady as they appeared. She definitely wasn’t. From a really young age she was what she called a “half-breed”, female on the outside “via a boy’s mind and a boy’s heart”.

As a boy, this didn’t pose difficulties, especially in a household of actors. She dressed in shorts and ties and also invested the majority of of her time pretending to be her transform ego, Eric Avon, the splendid, shining captain of cricket at Rugby. But as she reached adulthood, this boy self “was locked in a box”. Sometimes, when she was alone, she opened it up “and let the phantom, that was neither boy or girl however disembopassed away spirit, dance in the evening once there was no one to see”.

This surprise boy exploded into the light in 1947, when Du Maurier met and dropped in love with Ellen Doubleday, the wife of her US publisher, and the addrescheck out of the letter in which these revelations were made. Her feelings were not reciprocated, however they opened up the gates for a later affair through Gertrude Lawrence, an actor through whom her father had actually also been affiliated.


*

Fontaine via Judith Anderkid as Mrs Danvers, ‘the challenge that released a thousand drag acts’. Photograph: Sportsphoto Ltd/AllstarDu Maurier’s sexuality is complex to understand. The word transgender was not yet in common money. She didn’t think her desire for woguys made her a lesbian and dealt with against her “Venetian tendencies”. (Heterosexual sex was well-known in the family, also more exotically, as “going to Cairo”.) Actually she felt she was a boy, exceptionally much in love, and stuck in the wrong body. At the exact same time – probably pragmatically, possibly not – she was a woguy committed to staying married to her husband also.

She was by no indicates the just writer to feel herself 2 things at when. Many type of movie critics have captured a comparable note in Ernest Hemingway, who often created around sex as a place in which genders could be temporarily and also blisscompletely exadjusted. Virginia Woolf, too, experienced herself as protean, slipping in between sexes; her gender-shifting, time-distorting romp Orlando gave voice to her feelings for her lover Vita Sackville-West.

How a lot of Du Maurier’s sexuality is visible in Rebecca? The narrator consistently casts herself as an androgyne. She offers herself to Maxim as “your frifinish and also your companion, a sort of boy”. The complete warmth of her desire is for Rebecca. She speculates around what her body could have actually looked like: her elevation and also slenderness, the means she wore her coat slung lazily over her shoulders, the colour of her lipstick, her elusive scent, like the crushed petals of azarents.

When her husband"s affairs were exposed, she wrote how her life was entangled with the plot of her the majority of famous bookShe isn’t the just one obsessed through Rebecca’s missing body. Mrs Danvers serves as an extra apparent proxy for Venetian tendencies. In the novel’s most sex-related scene, “Danny” forces the narrator to put her hand in Rebecca’s slipper and also fondle her nightdress, while she murmurs an incantation to Rebecca’s hair, her underwear, exactly how her garments were torn from her body once she drowned.

No wonder Mrs Danvers’ was the challenge that launched a thousand also drag acts. She was embodying closeted lesbian realness also before Judith Anderboy catapulted her right into the high camp stratosphere in the Hitchcock film. Mind you, Anderson is given a run for her money by the revelation that Philip Larkin supplied to cheer himself up by looking in the mirror and also declaiming throatily: “I am Mrs de Winter currently.”

It’s not unexplained for a novel to contain traceable elements from its author’s life. What’s odd around Rebecca is that it seemed someexactly how predictive, too packed with things that belonged not just to Du Maurier’s previous yet to her future, also.


*

‘Du Maurier loved the house feverishly, calling it “my Mena”, even though it was freezing, rat-run and chunks of the old wing kept crashing off’ ... Menabilly in Cornwall. Photograph: Public DomainThe the majority of noticeable is Manderley, “secretive and silent as it had actually constantly been … a jewel in the hollow of a hand”. Manderley was based upon Menabilly, an abandoned house close to Fowey in Cornwall, which had bewitched Du Maurier as a girl. Like Manderley, Menabilly was strangely elusive. After she changed from Egypt, she regulated to lease it from the owner and also stayed based there for many of her life. She loved the home feverishly, calling it “my Mena”, also though it was freezing, rat-run and chunks of the old wing kept crashing off. But she never before fairly possessed it, and also in 1967 she was expelled after years of legal battles. Though she can still walk its grounds, Mena was as shed to her as if it had been swallowed in a fire.

“What is past is additionally future,” she once observed. When, in 1957, her husband also had a failure and was found to have actually been having actually 2 affairs concurrently, Du Maurier created a long letter to a frifinish, in which she speculated about how her very own life had become entangled via the plot of her the majority of renowned book. Was her husband identifying her via Rebecca, she wondered, and her composing hut via the sinister cottage on the beach? Would he shoot her in a blind access of rage, and also take her body out in Yggie, their beloved boat?

She was under a good deal of stress at the moment, yet the fantasy aligned through her feelings around the oddities of time, how it seemed to run simultaneously, so that the distant previous occasionally came extremely cshed, or repetitive in inexplicable ways. She explored this in novel after time-slip novel, from her 1931 deyet The Loving Spirit to The House on the Strand (1969), in which a young male takes an experimental drug that permits him to check out events following in his very own home in the 1fourth century.

The haunted residence on the Strand is quite choose a Du Maurier book in its own appropriate. Her novels are storeresidences in which she deposited eactivities, memories and fantasies. Their attribute was intensely individual, yet also public. If you’ve check out Rebecca you have actually no doubt wandered Manderley in your mind, passing with the tunnel of scarlet rhododendrons in the hope of tea and dripping crumpets by the library fire, entering vicariously into moods of love and terror.

Du Maurier was not the the majority of intellectual of authors. What she did was build emotional landscapes that have the right to be entered at will, in which hard and also untamable desires were given free rein. Maybe bereason of her relationship via sex, she had the ability to make human beings in which human being and even homes are mysterious and also mutable, not as they seem; haunted rooms in which disembopassed away spirits sometimes dance at absolute liberty